Archive for July, 2009

How Big Is the Problem?

Posted in Politics on July 28th, 2009 by Peter – Comments Off

We all know that there are Americans out there who want health insurance, but simply can’t afford it.  How big is this problem?  From Daylight’s Mark via McArdle comes the argument that the problem is not as big as we think:

On the 47 million people without health insurance point, that too is a statistic where there is less than meets the eye. … Of that 47 million, 14 million are already eligible for existing programs (Medicare, Medicaid, veterans’ benefits, SCHIP) yet have not enrolled, 9.7 million are not citizens, 9.1 million have household incomes over $75,000 and could but choose not to purchase insurance, and somewhere between 3 and 5 million are uninsured briefly(<2 months) between jobs. That leaves about 10 million Americans who are chronically without insurance. Needless to say, extending the blanket of coverage to this group should not cost $1.5 trillion and require a wholesale overhaul of all of medicine.

The post is worth reading in its entirity for his thoughtful approach to the entire healthcare question, especially the discussion of what is a right vs an earned priviledge and the fact that Americans do, overall, pay more for health care.

Mixed Messages

Posted in International Affairs on July 25th, 2009 by Peter – Comments Off

Fast on the heals of President Obama’s relations-thawing trip to Russia came this startling statement from the Vice President:

The reality is the Russians are where they are.  They have a shrinking population base, they have a withering economy, they have a banking sector and structure that is not likely to be able to withstand the next 15 years, they’re in a situation where the world is changing before them and they’re clinging to something in the past that is not sustainable.

Now don’t get me wrong:  the Russians continue to be dangerous.  Russia is one of the few countries in the world where officials will lie to your face, telling you stories that are demonstrably false.  As the Economist pointed out a few months ago, the US looms much larger in the Russian mind than vice versa.  As such, the Russians often play a zero sum game where it seems that in order for them to feel like they’ve won, you have to loose.

All that being said, President Obama has just expended considerable political capital on thawing relations with the Russians and trying to bring them on board with several initials that are in our national interest.  For the Vice President to sharply undercut this hard works so quickly seems… at the very least a little strange.  But then the Vice President is notorious for making, shall we say, “inopportune” remarks.

Not every truth needs to be aired publicly, especially when you’re an elected official.